Lines of reforming the structure of bargaining: the case of "Working Society-CGIL"
Loading ... 
FIGHT TO THE PRECARIOUSNESS
RISE IN WAGES AND PENSIONS
FOR DEMOCRACY AND AUDITORS RSU
Our priority is the fight against insecurity, because everyone has a permanent employment and contracting!
Since 1993 who works has lost, on average, 5,000 euros per year for the benefit of pension and profit, the union must indicate the manner and timing of a struggle for strong wage increases. The national collective work must have as its objective the increase in real wages.
The proposed reform of the model contract does not respond to emergencies now exist on wages and rights.
The national contract that higher wages and rights
It should be strengthened and merged by sector, because it is a guarantee instrument especially for employees of small businesses and can not be limited to only a partial recovery but real inflation should have the objective of higher wages and entitlements.
The contract integrative
The integrative bargaining should be used to improve safety conditions, wages and working conditions. It should also be extended to small businesses with contracting and territorial site. Wage increases should not be linked to productivity and profitability of businesses as has happened in recent years.
purchasing power to safeguard
The proposed CGIL CISL UIL to increase 2 to 3 years duration of contract and the biennium budget "is possible on condition that it is an established tool automatic annual inflation recovery and changed the basket of calculating inflation.
no incentive to overtime
E 'irresponsible tax incentives with the overtime: "If you want more money working longer hours and make available" means to encourage workers to worsen their conditions of work and life, taking advantage of their low wages. We know also that many accidents occur for loads of work and fatigue. Increasing hours, giving companies the opportunity to choose the workers, would be a severe blow to the union in the workplace
democracy and trade union representation
In all workplaces must be elected representation Unitarian. Only coalitions or individual unions representing more than 50% of the workers concerned must be able to sign the agreements. On the platform CGIL CISL and UIL on the agreement should be a real consultation with the registration of the vote, the right to information and contradictory, and pluralist electoral commission.
Even the category of agreements are subject to a path of consultation and approval, for both platforms that the grounds for agreement through the voting certificate of workers and freedom of movement inside and outside the workplace, of different positions.
Serves a trade union should aim to give workers more money through the national bargaining, integrative and the reduction of tax on salaries medium / low. If we want the families can secure the right to health, education and live in dignity, these salaries and pensions they no longer enough.
The fight against insecurity must be practical because young people and everyone has the right to a real job and paid a decent and this is achieved ridando value to the contract for an unlimited period of restricting the use of temporary employment relationships and demanding work environments healthier and safer.
It is for workers to discuss and decide in the workplace on these issues that will also cover their future working conditions, to build choices going forward and not backwards over the current situation.
WORK SOCIETA'-CHANGE ROUTE
Programmatic area of Cgil 13 May 2005
download and spread the flyer in. pdf
download and spread the flyer in. doc
RETE28APRILE FOR THE NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
No
THE DOCUMENT CGIL, CISL, UIL ON trading
GABBIE TO PAY WAGES AND THE EXCHANGE-PRODUCTIVITY '
ELIMINATION OF THE NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
The document CGIL, CISL, UIL on the reform of bargaining is deeply wrong because in the face of disaster wage Italians, who are the lowest among those of more advanced industrial countries, instead of questioning the policy of conciliation and moderation in that the last fifteen years has led to this negative result in the re even worse.
The document is:
1. Says that to improve income, security and quality of work is necessary to increase the quality, competitiveness and productivity. The document does not ever talk of redistribution of wealth and again in practice the policy of two steps: first the development and then the money. That means, in other words, which earn more should simply work harder. This will have negative effects on everyone, and especially on women who already have lower wages and are less available to the extraordinary because, between work and productive work of reproductive actually works make it two.
2. Limits the increase in the national contract inflation "realistically expected", which will be measured with a new basket. In fact the demands of national contracts will be placed prior to the agreement at central level between confederations and counterparties, public and private. The reference to "support and enhancement of purchasing power" does not mean that wages may actually increase. The real risk is to call another name quell'inflazione program that has destroyed in the contracts the purchasing power of wages. Finally, stretches of three years duration of contracts. With the risk of diluting even more time in the low wage increases of national agreements.
3. Says that to "enhance" the wages the seat is the second-level bargaining. It will be linked to 5 parameters: "productivity, quality, profitability, efficiency, effectiveness". The second level of negotiations will take place in that company at local level. All the rules of bargaining second level will once again redefined the national contract renewals. In short, when you agree increases national contracts also define the space for corporate or territorial bargaining. E 'then the clear risk of contractual federalism, namely the cages wage and salary spread of individual and the whole variable and flexible.
4. Delete the right of workers to vote on platforms. We will vote - and not with the referendum but through "consultation certified" - only on the agreements already defined, so without a real and substantial participation of workers in the negotiations. So you go to a centralized and bureaucratic model of labor relations, devoid of real democracy.
At a time when workers need to strengthen the national contract, to find the strength to overcome the fragmentation of holdings and insecurity, blackmail job el'attacco continuous rights, the document CGIL, CISL, UIL all 'Weakens its opposite the main instrument of power of workers: the national contract. It does so based on a mistaken, that wages in these years would not be increased too much for the national contract. In reality there was too little.
The agreement of July 1993 already posed constraints to the national contract, linked to inflation program, aimed at business and the relationship between wages and productivity. Rather than abandon the constraints that led to the salary Italian 23esimo place in OECD countries, the document CGIL, CISL, UIL strengthens them, and not worse improving the understanding of July 23.
Thus the treaty opens in top, with a rigid and unamendable that has not been voted by workers and employees, without any real mandate and the likelihood of a conclusion downward compared to the same limited rights already existing.
The Confederation wants to dismantle the national contract in order to distribute money in a discriminatory manner between the workers and employees. We must prepare for the clash, no new concessions. For this we propose an alternative:
1. To abandon the bond of inflation compared with national contracts. Contracts must be able to increase wages when the economy goes well and ensure the purchasing power when it goes wrong. We must, in other words, an offensive made of strong wage increases in national contracts for all workers and employees.
2. A mechanism for automatic wage increases that recover, even if only partially, growth in inflation, particularly if the companies delay to renew contracts or prices rise suddenly.
3. The reduction of the bonds that bind tightly wages to productivity and flexibility, with the full freedom to bargain in companies working conditions, professionalism, on wages.
4. Increased trade union democracy based on the right of workers to decide by secret ballot and practices transparent and controlled, on platforms and agreements. The overcoming of shares reserved for organizations signatories of the contracts in the elections of the RSU, a real participation in the decisions of the union at all levels.
It is necessary claim an economic policy that protects wages and pensions and effectively redistribute the wealth. We must reduce taxes for all wages and pensions, not just for overtime. It should be restored to a price control should be improved and the performance of public services. It should be taxing the wealth accumulated in these years. We say enough to wage moderation and conciliation, which are the real causes of the disaster wage in Italy, we say just the precariousness of work and rights.
Yes
THE NATIONAL CONTRACT, THE WAGES,
RIGHTS TO THE WORK SAFE
AUDITORS TO DEMOCRACY
Rome, 16 May 2008
May 16, 2008 at 10:15 pm