Mayors and administrators document Val di Susa on exit from observatory
Loading ... 
We were speaking with "other" of Tav and its more recent developments should probably spend a long round of words. Fortunately, however, this document is addressed to friends, well aware that these long 17 years of mobilization and effort, of which we proudly proud. So, as we write to friends informed, we can go straight to the point. Who are we?
Administrators claim that we are strongly their political paths and their ancient and deep-rooted opposition to Tav and hope with all my heart that this "location" still means something. As directors feel the need and the desire to manage economic and social processes that are interested in our territories and to address environmental emergencies that affect us every day. This need and this should feel a duty to achieve them with the people, making over their concerns and their problems, listening to the needs and demands, making them not only involved decisions taken, but discussing and possibly taking with them. Why write?
- writing helps to make mental
- writing with clarity is less likely to be misunderstood
- writing can be read by reading to others who may share and subscribe
- writing can be discussed clearly and precisely with those who do not share
- writing is perceived to be more popular.
But write what? We all know that the Center was designed to ease a political and social tension that would no longer be sustainable long been in a democratic country. When we felt the duty to try to give an outlet to the political barricades. We know that many of us have also initially hoped that the Center was the right place to give credibility and resonance that NO scientifically documented and never ruling, which for But so many years we have expressed general indifference of all, by the media to the various governments, as they followed. We also know that others, including us, have been regarded with distrust considering an observatory a means to smuggle the "sharing" of the territory and not on the working method and the route taken, but the work itself. Instrument not of confrontation but of "conciliation". In light of recent events:
- European funding
- The great confusion in the 3rd quaderno
- A well-founded suspicion that there is a ghost, that the government will soon pull out of the hat
- The absolute lack of respect shown by institutional Region in perfect solitude in approving the tunnel "service" (!) Frejus, in complete contradiction with the demand for new policies transport conversion Rubber / Iron
- Convening a Palazzo Chigi of the mayor of Chiomonte
- Of the hearings, aimed at sharing the solution of social conflict in the presence of large shipyards
- The recent statements by President Prodi on the timing of construction of the Turin-Lyon
and in the light: 
-as always propagandato by national media, propaganda that we have never been able to effectively and that we were not able to judge with due severity
- The policy of the Government, insists that every day through his ministers, the determination to implement the project at any cost, regardless of work
- The official acts that will continuously be made to accelerate decision-making and project
- The state of the art design and procedural Observatory made to work
- The continued transformation of a technical comparison in a political, not fulfilling the commitments made to carry out close political meetings, to examine the emerging technical data and factual esautorando decision-making skills, pushed into the hands of one party we can say that the Center:
1. has exhausted its task (the line is not saturated historical therefore no need to plan today and tomorrow make a new line)
2. has gradually changed, despite the efforts of the technicians of Valle, his office (whether to do the work and not stand as a place of negotiation, of "collaboration with the territories concerned," to decide how and where to implement the project ) 3rd was used with strategic precision by whom the government has a long first convened conferences and pre-conference services, then submitted plans secret, which nobody has seen or been able to see, to ask for European funding. And if the fact is not in itself very serious, it would be good material for a farce. We also believe that maintaining artificially alive this tool is not to exacerbate the confusion around the general theme. Disorientation that proposers Media and the work they know perfectly how to use, for their benefit and our detriment.
It 'clear that we do not escape the gravity of the moment and the future risks. We are aware that
But we are not ever been so naive as to think that the opposite of "No, especially out of the Valley (where it has always been quite a deal of" how ") can endure long compact. 
It 'obvious that none of us is keen to return to build barricades.
But we also know that when you find the games, the projects will be ghost pulled out of the cylinder and return to talking about cores, and discenderie sites is becoming increasingly close. We think it is irresponsible to pretend that this moment is far: now we can expose the game and immediately study a new strategy. What we require? What we propose? Based on the assumption that the political position expressed in this document has the same dignity as any other legitimate position, We require a political meeting, urgently, within the first ten days of December, between the Directors of the Valley. It could well go a Conference of Mayors, provided expanded to all the directors involved, all with right of speech and all with equal dignity. We propose to debate and vote at that meeting, the immediate output by, on the basis of the reasons expressed above. We propose, if they are unable to reach agreement on the request for suspension of work, or on our exit from it, to give immediate and strong communication to the Italian government, the European Parliament and national and foreign media, stating the reasons and indicating how the work, while apprezzabilissimo and certainly honest to our technicians, has more reason to continue, since they are no longer a basis upon which the Center itself was established.
Finally, we propose to plan a new strategy together to discuss and possibly facing the next government's choices in transport policy and planning on
have-to-now-up-the-their-accession
Back to main page
